Elon Musk’s latest “Twitter information” drop has left extra liberal journalists fuming, after the mannequin new Twitter proprietor unexpectedly fired former FBI regular Counsel James Baker from the agency in developments revealed Tuesday.
Substack journalist Matt Taibbi introduced that the drop of inner paperwork was delayed attributable to discovering that Baker had been “vetting” the paperwork beforehand, with out Musk’s information.
the earlier FBI official expressed assist for censoring the Hunter Biden laptop pc story inside the most important set of Twitter information Taibbi launched final week. whereas on the bureau, Baker labored beneath former Director James Comey and performed a key position inside the Russia collusion investigation involving Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential advertising and marketing campaign.
Musk wrote on Twitter, “In gentle of considerations about Baker’s attainable position in suppression of information important to the ultimate public dialogue, he was exited from Twitter right this second.”
The information prompted rather tons of of reactions on-line. Conservative pundits cheered Musk for “cleansing residence” whereas Republicans referred to as for Baker to testify earlier than Congress.
however some liberal media figures noticed nothing unsuitable with Baker’s involvement in trying over the paperwork that detailed how the agency chosen to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop pc story in October of 2020.
mom Jones reporter Dan Friedman instructed Baker was “solely a man with a tough job” who was unfairly maligned.
“Jim Baker was involved in numerous controversies as a outcome of he was the FBI’s regular counsel. Is he “one factor of a Zelig” or solely a man with a tough job? Baker has been the topic of mch innuedo like this, however not been found to have leaked something.”
Former Twitter Deputy regular Counsel and former FBI regular counsel Jim Baker
(Ron Sachs/Consolidated information footage/Getty photos)
Former New Yorker journalist James Surowiecki mocked the thought he ought to not have been involved.
“A prime lawyer at Twitter vetted the ultimate public launch of information that contained supplies which might expose the agency to authorized authorized accountability, collectively with with regard to privateness factors. that is actually scandalous,” he tweeted.
Many on the left are sounding the alarm about Elon Musk’s Twitter takeover.
(FOX)
NBC information reporter Ben Collins additionally took the most important focus off Baker, writing, “The scandal right here is that Elon Musk found who his agency’s deputy regular counsel was six weeks after he purchased it.”
New Republic reporter Matt Ford knocked the story as a non-scandal.
“Twitter’s regular counsel had the unmitigated gall to overview inner paperwork earlier than they have been publicly launched,” he tweeted.
protection lawyer and Substack author Ken White additionally downplayed the information, writing in a Twitter thread, “Wow this Jim Baker narrative from Musk & Taibbi is determined and dumb.”
In observe-up tweets he slammed Musk’s “fool viewers” and mocked the latest information as “significantly dumb.”
“however right this second’s new mini-replace to the ‘scandal’ is very dumb. Oh, in-residence regular counsel appeared by way of supplies a few controversy earlier than they have been despatched to the press? stunning,” he wrote.
Liberal information shops who denounced the Hunter Biden laptop pc as Russian disinformation earlier than the 2020 election have paid little consideration to the latest bombshell Twitter developments.
click on right here TO GET THE FOX information APP
![Google Messages preps voice recorder redesign [Gallery]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uEUGsUnZd8tmvJJV8gjqGAe6fjVoM_uPG9NUJmLgto4_vtll8uNUxH5Tsv8cNZdnywO1D1eRUm98_RruofzdBxvoP1jPKT2O1dBIcjq65RqQYYT0B3FP3Dt3hFFK74IOMCOxWARW-HCMT5dQVr9GIbB_oUK02yH7pIMVZj8OFt2FNynZXDcjaKytz7WR9nLWbaA88Jcda0=w100)
0 Comments